Every bomb feeds the burn pile.

Every BurnBomb™ routes 5% of its total final pot in ETH to the $BURN contract, which uses that ETH to buy $BURN off the market and lock it forever.

That's just the first loop. Every $BURN swap (including the buyback itself) generates trading fees. TTT's FeeSplitter routes 50% of those fees to the BurnToken strategy contract · the launcher · which uses that ETH to sweep TTT NFTs at floor and relist them at +20%. When those NFTs sell, the ETH proceeds flow back into the $BURN buyback reservoir, fueling more buybacks, which generate more swap fees, which buy more NFTs, which fund more buybacks.

More games → more rake → more buybacks → more swap fees → more NFT cycles → more buybacks → less circulating supply → mechanical price pressure on every $BURN holder's bag.

1. Players claim slots in a BurnBomb Minnow round (0.001 → 0.1 Ξ each, 100 slots).
2. Round settles. 5% of the pot flows to the live $BURN contract as plain ETH. A sold-out Minnow round (5.05 Ξ max pot) sends ~0.25 Ξ; a typical mid-pot round (~1 Ξ) sends ~0.05 Ξ.
3. That ETH sits in the $BURN buyback reservoir. Anyone (MEV bots primarily) can call buyback() to swap reservoir ETH for $BURN tokens on the Uniswap V4 pool.
4. The bought $BURN tokens are locked in the contract forever. They cannot be retrieved, sold, or transferred. Lock-as-burn.
5. Circulating supply shrinks. Every existing holder owns a larger share of the same total $BURN.

BurnBomb is the primary deflation engine for $BURN. Every game accelerates supply contraction. As BurnBomb adoption grows, the burn rate compounds.

And BurnBomb is just one game on the platform. Future games (Game #2: Guess-the-NFT is locked in design) all route their rake to the same $BURN contract. Every game on the platform feeds the same pile. One contract, many funnels.

$BURN isn't a memecoin and it isn't a yield token. It's the economic anchor of an emerging platform of on-chain games. Every game must:

• Route a percentage of all revenue to the $BURN contract on Ethereum mainnet · across every game in the family, rake stays bridge-free
• Use verifiable on-chain randomness (BurnBomb uses dual oracles · Chainlink VRF v2.5 + Supra dVRF V3 · and settles on whichever returns first; other games may pick what fits)
• Use pull-payment patterns (no stranded funds)

Holding $BURN is exposure to the success of every game in this family · existing and future · without picking which game wins.

A sold-out Minnow round routes ~0.2525 Ξ(5% of the 5.05 Ξ max pot) to the $BURN buyback reservoir. At $3,000/ETH that's roughly $760 in ETH per round, locking ~150k $BURN at a $0.005 token price · permanently out of circulation, per round.

Most rounds won't sell out · realistically a Minnow at ~1 Ξ pot routes ~0.05 Ξ (~$150) to buyback. Multiply by round frequency across the family of BurnBomb-style games to reach the steady-state flywheel.

The platform thesis: BurnBomb is the first game. Game #2 and beyond all route to the same $BURN contract. Adoption compounds across games, not per-game.

(Numbers are illustrative · actual $BURN price, pot sizes, and round velocity determine real-world deflation rate. Track live totals on the bomb home page.)

$BURN is not a security. Holding it does not entitle you to dividends, revenue share, voting rights, or any contractual cash flow. The mechanics described here are token-level supply effects, observable on chain. Past deflation does not predict future deflation. Token prices are volatile and can go to zero. Treat $BURN as you would any other experimental on-chain asset · do your own research, never invest more than you can afford to lose, and verify every claim against the deployed contracts.